Long-delayed Wigley Road rezoning case clears initial hurdle

Wigley Road rezoning case
A rendering of a home in the proposed Provence Estates subdivision on Wigley Road.

After more than a year of delays, the Cobb Planning Commission Tuesday recommended approval of a Wigley Road rezoning case that would convert hilly, rocky former farm terrain into a single-family subdivision.

The commission vote was 4-1 in favor of an application by Oak Hall Companies for single-family homes on 96 acres on what once was the Wigley family farm. The land abuts the Cherokee County line to the north, and is north of Sweat Mountain, Jamerson Road and Summitop Road.

The planning board initially heard the case in May but placed a 60-day hold on the application, which was once again delayed in July.

The developer wanted to build 95 homes for a community to be called Provence Estates, but the commissioners recommended 91 instead. Parks Huff, an attorney for Oak Hall, noted the rarity of a proposal for single-family homes that is around one to an acre.

Since the planning board recommended the R-30 OSC category, roughly half the tract would be placed in a conservation easement.

The land is from the estate of Audra Mae Wigley and was part of the Wigley Farm in Northeast Cobb. Initially, the Oak Hall application was for 55 acres, but both pieces of the former farm property were put together in a single request earlier this year.

Some neighbors were opposed for traffic as well as for stormwater runoff issues, and it was a factor outgoing planning commissioner Thea Powell cited for her vote against the request.

The Cobb Board of Commissioners will have the final say on the rezoning request on Aug. 21.

 

Get Our Free E-Mail Newsletter!

Every Sunday we round up the week’s top headlines and preview the upcoming week in the East Cobb News Digest. Click here to sign up, and you’re good to go!

1 thought on “Long-delayed Wigley Road rezoning case clears initial hurdle”

  1. This development will have a major impact on my subdivision. I see runoff from that mountain. I went three times to oppose this development. Just because you can build a home on the property does not mean you should.

Comments are closed.