The Cobb County School District will be installing COVID-19 safety products in all 67 elementary schools after the school board approved an emergency request on Thursday.
The Cobb Board of Education voted 4-2 during a work session to spend up to $12 million to equip elementary schools with special UV disinfecting lights, hand sanitizers and other equipment from the district’s fund balance.
The district received earlier stimulus funding to provide safety equipment as a “proof of concept” measure at Argyle, Belmont Hills and Bryant elementary schools in South Cobb during the fall semester (see video at the bottom).
Superintendent Chris Ragsdale said the money is needed now, with the holiday break coming, and because additional stimulus funding from Congress that would pay for additional equipment hasn’t been forthcoming.
Congress could take action on a new spending package related to COVID-19 by Friday. The Cobb school district has set aside $15 million of its own funding for safety equipment, but Ragsdale intends for the new $12 million amount to be reimbursed from the federal government.
“We want to do everything we can to maintain a healthy classroom environment,” Ragsdale said, adding that the goal is to continue providing face-to-face learning when the spring semester begins in January.
Cobb schools are finishing the fall semester all-online due to rising COVID cases. Ragsdale said he would have liked to have had more schools equipped by now, and that might have prevented this week’s decision to go to remote learning.
Board members Charisse Davis and Jaha Howard voted against the spending, saying these were unproven projects and that there are more important priorities to keep students and staff safe that are being ignored.
The hand sanitizing machines, made by 30e Scientific and called “Iggy,” spray water with a small amount acqueous ozone to reduce bacteria, and will be placed in high-traffic areas of schools. The low-voltage UV lights, made by ProTek Life and called Cleanz254, disinfect classrooms daily after the school day is over. The process takes an hour overnight, and the vendor claims it kills 99.99 percent of all microbes in a classroom.
Howard said he hasn’t seen any data or evidence that the products work, and noted that the Cobb school district is the first client for the hand sanitizer manufacturer.
“I don’t understand why we’re making such a huge investment in something that’s secondary,” Howard said, calling the safety products “bells and whistles” and added that the board is being asked to spend “money we don’t really have.”
“We have some basic infrastructure that is not in place. This is a luxury,” Howard said. “How about that we make sure that all of our schools have masks?
Ragsdale said Howard was inaccurate with some of his comments, saying that while the hand sanitizing machines are new, acqueous ozone is not, nor are UV lights. The district also is providing masks and is taking steps to bring on more supply nurses.
Howard continued to press the issue, but board attorney Clem Doyle advised chairman Brad Wheeler to move on.
Board member Randy Scamihorn interrupted Howard, and said his colleague was doing little more than offering his opinion.
“I disapprove of us trying to get into the superintendent’s business,” Scamihorn said. “Our job is not to interrogate them on the companies.”
When Howard finally asked Ragsdale if he was “comfortable” recommending such a purchase, the superintendent said he wouldn’t have done so if he didn’t think the equipment was effective.
Related Content
- Cobb health director urges caution in letter to school parents
- Cobb schools reveal face-to-face, remote options for spring semester
- Pope athletic director recognized by administrators group
- Cobb schools report 241 new COVID cases as total nears 1,000
- Lassiter student chosen for AP College Board digital art exhibit
- Walton graduate receives Rhodes Scholarship
- Cobb schools report 434 new COVID cases since reopening
- Cobb school board member rips colleagues for ‘systemic racism’
- Cobb school superintendent: ‘No metrics’ for COVID closures
- Cobb schools report 105 new COVID cases in 53 schools
- Rocky Mount ES choir pays a virtual Veterans Day tribute
- Cobb schools post record graduation rate in 2020
Get Our Free E-Mail Newsletter!
Every Sunday we round up the week’s top headlines and preview the upcoming week in the East Cobb News Digest. Click here to sign up, and you’re good to go!
You skipped over the portion of the meeting where Scamihorn called Dr. Howard “boy” when interrupting him.
It may show what is in that man’s mind. There is no place for that kind of person in a School board. Even if he’s unaware of his prejudicial language of communication, it is unacceptable today.
It’s quite comforting (not) that Ragsdale is putting an estimated $15M of taxpayer money out there with the intention of using federal money that hasn’t been promised yet, much less in the amount that he’s assuming will be there, to offset what the county pays for it. What happens if it doesn’t, in whole or in part? As to cost: is this being done as an emergency thing to go around the price bidding that’s supposed to be happening?
Why now, when this whole thing is winding down? Why not for cold and flu seasons in past years (even Ragsdale says that this is not new technology) or after graduations in May?
What about ongoing costs? Aqueous ozone is not a one-and-done deal – look it up online. Neither is the electricity cost for the UV lights (or the lights, themselves). Who covers that? That won’t be federally reimbursed. What happens when it’s discovered that the benefit is negligible and the replacement costs aren’t justified? Will this new system be scrapped? Will it replace the usual cleaning methods or will they both be done (if so, then why; if not, then have the limitations of the new system been taken into account?)? I’m with Howard on this one.
Has any real testing been done on the effects of children being exposed to this constantly for hours straight every day? It’s not like there’s a separate area into which affected students can be taught … even that would have its own set of ongoing costs … or having the aqueous ozone in restrooms only, like seen in many places now. Has any testing been done in the three pilot schools to gauge what difference has occurred because of the installations of the systems – or the costs thereof?
What is the purpose of the CCSD school board if not to look out for the educational system, in all aspects, of CCSD students? When did asking questions of the superintendent become a no-no? Did the organizational system change and we now have school district kings? There are far too many questions and far too few answers to run into this expensive project without discussion. Howard has it right; Scamihorn has it wrong. It’s their job to interject opinions and ask questions before they vote on doing or not doing something (or wasn’t that allowed, either?) … the CCSD board is not a rubber stamp for the superintendent.