Revised East Cobb Cityhood bill moves up referendum to May

State Rep. Matt Dollar, East Cobb cityhood bill
State Rep. Matt Dollar, East Cobb cityhood bill chief sponsor

The East Cobb Cityhood bill that was favorably reported out of a State House Committee earlier this month would move up a referendum for voters in the proposed city limits from November to May.

If approved by the Georgia General Assembly during the current session, the bill would call for a May 24 referendum for eligible voters in the proposed city limits.

That’s the date of the 2022 general primary in Georgia.

Those voters would determine whether a City of East Cobb with a population of around 60,000, would be created out of a 25-square-mile area of unincorporated Cobb along the Johnson Ferry Road corridor.

Another significant change presented by chief sponsor State Rep. Matt Dollar on Monday to the House Governmental Affairs Committee would change the council-mayor form of government—you can watch a replay of the meeting here.

The original HB 841 called for a “weak mayor” form of government with six city council members. They would choose among themselves a mayor to serve a two-year term—with a two-term limit.

In Dollar’s change announced Monday, a mayor would be elected citywide, and six city council members also would be elected citywide. But two members would have to reside in each of three council districts.

Dollar said in a brief committee meeting Monday that the changes were being made due to feedback from the public and by committee lawmakers.

The revised bill HB 841 (you can read it here) was offered as a substitute just as the committee and one of its subcommittees met two weeks ago to consider it.

Supporters and opponents of the bill, including lawmakers and citizens, spoke at both meetings.

Referendum language in the original version of HB 841.

But what wasn’t discussed was the new referendum date. Neither Dollar nor Ed Setzler, a new co-sponsor who is a Republican from North Cobb, mentioned it during those public meetings two weeks ago.

The substitute bill was not posted online for the general public until after the full committee issued a “do pass” recommendation.

The original legislation submitted in 2021 by Dollar and State Rep. Sharon Cooper, both East Cobb Republicans, called for a referendum to be included on Nov. 6 general election ballot.

 

The May referendum language in the substitute HB 841 reported out a House committee.

Lawmakers returned to regular business on Monday after spending last week in budget meetings.

East Cobb News left a message with Dollar on Sunday seeking comment about the proposed change in the referendum date.

At Monday’s committee meeting, he said the reason for changing it was to have a mayor and city council elected in November to avoid a special election in early 2023.

He said the mayor and council members would be elected to four-year terms, and would be limited to serving three terms.

But committee member Mary Margaret Oliver was skeptical that there would be sufficient time for a Cityhood bill that passed early in the legislative session and signed into law to be put on the May primary ballot.

She called the process “maximum chaos.”

East Cobb News also contacted the Committee for East Cobb Cityhood on Sunday.

In an e-mailed response Sunday evening, spokeswoman Cindy Cooperman said the group “has evaluated and is supportive of holding a referendum vote in the May primary. If the majority of residents in East Cobb vote yes to Cityhood, it opens the door for a council to be elected in November thereby avoiding the need for a special election. In addition to being more cost effective, this timing is ideal to get an elected council in place for 2023.”

On Monday, the Governmental Affairs Committee voted to favorably report the bill.

The next step will be for HB 841 to go to the House Rules Committee, which would schedule the bill for a debate and vote by the full House.

Related content:

 

Get Our Free E-Mail Newsletter!

Every Sunday we round up the week’s top headlines and preview the upcoming week in the East Cobb News Digest. Click here to sign up, and you’re good to go!

6 thoughts on “Revised East Cobb Cityhood bill moves up referendum to May”

  1. Great! Trying to create a city hood against our wishes. And then more taxes to pay. I thought we Republicans were against big government. Sheesh!

    • We Republicans are… Sadly, this is no longer the Republican stronghold it once was – and if there’s one thing Democrats love, it’s more layers of government. They’d rather the government think and provide for them, instead of being independent. They don’t mind paying higher taxes in exchange for “free” municipal services. After all, the government has a great track record of managing money and providing quality services, right?

    • This is the same reason SPLOST elections are always held separately from general elections. Primary election turnouts are painfully low and motivated activists can get their way a lot easier without having to persuade large numbers of people.

    • Exactly what I was thinking. They know it won’t pass in November when more than 17 people show up to vote.

      Luckily, I’m outside of the proposed city limit so I’m safe. But anyone within the limit should get very vigilant, very quickly. You’re not going to be able to undo this damage once it’s in place.

Comments are closed.